Like most websites we use cookies to improve your experience and provide us with anonymous visitor information. If you are happy with this use of cookies click OK.
Read more about our use of cookies and how you can switch off cookies in our Privacy Policy. [x] Close

Family Law Blog

Comment on divorce & family law 

The pros and cons of involving children in family law proceedings


Children in English Family Court cases.

The debate about whether children should have a voice in cases which decide their future was recently reignited. The BBC reported (Should children be heard in English family court cases?) that some children and campaigners supported by some senior family law judges wanted to see a change in the law to allow children to speak to the judge in their case, if they so choose.

Is this a sensible idea or not?

The current position regarding the child’s voice

At present children have no right to speak to a judge that might be deciding a case about their future and whether they should live with, mum, dad or neither of their parents.

An independent organisation called CAFCASS is appointed in cases involving children to report to the court and the judge about what is in the best interest and welfare of the children. Where a child is about 8 years or older CAFCASS can also send a report to the court setting out what that child’s ‘wishes and feelings’ are about the case.

However, even with older children and teenagers they rarely get to meet a judge or speak to them personally.

Therefore, some children and particularly older ones must naturally feel they have no say in any decision about them and this can feel very unfair.

The advantages of children speaking directly to a judge

Giving a child a voice in family proceedings would help children feel that are properly part of a process which is making decisions about them. It could help them feel involved and that they too have a say. For older children it could be an invaluable way to try and assist them to come to terms with the situation they find themselves in.

The disadvantages of children speaking directly to a judge

For younger children it may not be so appropriate as they may feel under pressure to say the right thing or feel intimidated by having to meet a judge even if that is just in an office rather than a courtroom.

It is a complex debate and there is probably no one answer that fits all, as every case about children is different and every child is different. As a result, a change in the law that sees all children from a certain age automatically made to speak to the judge is probably not right.

As in most family law matters but particularly sensitive ones which involve children it is very important that each case is considered individually, which is why it is also very important to take specialist and bespoke advice about such issues.

Luci Larkin
Family law solicitor, Barnet


Loading comments...

The recent development of some senior judges, making a note of their judgement in the form of a letter / communication for the children, and directing it is read to the children is helpful as it confirms for the children the reasons behind the decision and often that the child’s voice has been heard. 

This is only needed where the children have been caught up in the case but happens so often with older children in particular.

Cafcass also with older children will sometimes invite them to write a letter to the judge and attach it to their report which again gives the child a feeling of having a voice.

For my part if a child is old enough to understand there is a court case about them then they are old enough to want to be asked how they feel.  All those involved do mostly take those feelings into account but it is the feedback to the child often that is missing so they know they were heard.

By Karen Agnew-Griffith on Thursday November 16, 2017

What do you think?

Have your say



Receive your FREE guide

Your free guide will be available to download immediately and a copy sent by email. Your email address will not be used to send any further correspondence without your permission.