Family Matters

Your monthly family law digest from Woolley & Co, Solicitors


February 2017

How can we make divorce less confrontational?

Baroness Deech has never been one to mince her words. Recently, she spoke of the urgent need to “clean-up” the divorce process, making it less inflammatory and antagonistic than it currently is.

In Brief

Should there be more, or less secrecy around divorce?

A recent Court of Appeal case set me thinking about privacy issues in divorce. In the case in question a divorcee embroiled in a legal fight over money with her ex-husband failed to persuade senior judges to bar journalists from...
... more

What makes a good marriage?

After the dismal marking of Divorce Week last month, it is wonderful to be celebrating commitment with Marriage Week in February. Fittingly finishing its seven-day run on Valentine’s Day, it is a chance for every happy couple to...
... more

Special occasions for separated parents

When parents separate one of the main issues of conflict relates to arrangements for the children.  I am often contacted by distressed parents who are unable to reach an agreement with their former partner as to the weekly arrangements...
... more

Divorce Preparation Checklist - 5 things you didn’t know about divorce

There’s been a lot of talk in the last week about so called ‘divorce week’ – the busiest week of the year for us family lawyers. Personally, I don’t think this is something to...
... more

Brexit is the last straw for some relationships

The start of a New Year historically sees an influx of new clients making contact with us family lawyers to start off the divorce process. One of the first steps for a lawyer is discuss and consider the reasons for...
... more

She is proposing a Divorce (Financial Provision) Bill to improve the process and help children whose future needs may be jeopardised by the waste of parental assets and fighting over money in a separation negotiation.

Sounds lovely doesn’t it? The sentiment is certainly one everyone should get behind and it is a step in the right direction. It is a brilliant idea that would make prenuptial agreements legally binding and give people a degree of certainty over what assets they would walk away from if they split up.

Download free guide

There is a “but” though. And it’s this. Pre-nup all sorted before getting married, legally binding in the event of a divorce – but what if something changes? These agreements are designed to safeguard assets both parties have before they join in matrimony. What about the assets they then accrue during the marriage? Those aren’t included in the agreement so there would still then need to be a negotiation, with the starting assumption a 50/50 split but lots of things to be considered as always.

If a couple has been married for 20 years, there will be lots to consider. They may have a house, bank accounts, savings, pensions etc. There may have been one main breadwinner paying for the bulk of this, but the other party may have given up a career to bring up the children and have lower earning potential going forward. It is still a tricky negotiation, fraught with difficulties and, even with the proposed changes, this could be prickly and lead to additional cost for the couple, cutting into those assets and affecting provision for children.

A way to address this issue would be for the pre-nup to be changed regularly, or even every time there was a change in circumstances. This is not viable really though and if we proposed this, many out there would quite understandably suggest this is just a ploy by divorce lawyers to get more business.

The root of the problem remains the current divorce process that forces couples to apportion blame. Even if you choose unreasonable behaviour as a ground for divorce, you then need to give examples. That is the law. This can be anything from “they never do the washing up” to “snoring” to “they drink too much”. The petitioner has to put something though. A finger of blame must be pointed.

The other party then needs to respond. This inevitably causes animosity and bad feeling all round. This means that, when it comes to negotiating for a settlement, potentially, both parties are in a more disgruntled state they might otherwise be. This leads to more difficult negotiations which can be longer, with both parties less willing to compromise, and needing more time from solicitors. It could potentially lead to time in court to settle it. A no fault divorce is what we really need to get over this fundamental flaw in the system. No finger pointing, no petrol poured on a simmering fire.

I don’t think Baroness Deech’s Bill will get passed. I do think though it is admirable and a step in the right direction and if it gets people talking about and examining the current system, then we are at least on the right road, in my opinion.


Richard England
Family law solicitor, Birmingham


Woolley & Co, Solicitors
Warwick Enterprise Park,
Warwick CV35 9EF
Call 0800 321 3832
Mobile 0330 330 3832
Outside UK +44 (0)1789 330310     

© Woolley & Co, Solicitors. All rights reserved. No unauthorised copying, extraction or other use is allowed except with our prior written permission. Woolley & Co Solicitors is the trading name of Woolley & Co Limited, company number 07387222. Woolley & Co, Solicitors is a member of the Law Society and authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. A list of directors is available from our registered office which is Warwick Enterprise Park, Wellesbourne, Warwick, CV35 9EF. VAT Reg. No. 687 644 675.

Click here to unsubscribe.