Like most websites we use cookies to improve your experience and provide us with anonymous visitor information. If you are happy with this use of cookies click OK.
Read more about our use of cookies and how you can switch off cookies in our Privacy Policy. [x] Close

Family Law Blog

Comment on divorce & family law 

Debate around shared parenting causes confusion


It has been difficult to keep up with the debate swinging backwards and forward but I think the upshot is that there is still no legal obligation on shared parenting. I think that’s the case.

Much was made of this point in the Family Justice Review. The interim report suggested that, for the first time, it should be enshrined in law that children should be entitled to a meaningful relationship with both parents. Fathers and others out for justice across the land cheered at the thought. However, the cheers turned to groans when the final FJR report came out in November and the proposal had been dropped. It was argued that it would be impossible to be prescriptive over how much time the children should stay with each.

Then there was the suggestion a couple of months ago that it was being resurrected and I blogged about it at the time (Giving all divorced parents the right to see their children) as being a good thing. Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, and Iain Duncan Smith, the Welfare Secretary, were understood to support the plans. The Conservatives also pledged to introduce the reforms while in opposition. Now though it seems it has gone again so the rule is that children don’t have a legal right to a relationship with both parents or, as some might see it fathers don’t have the right to a relationship with their children. There is a good analysis of the issue in Why the Government is wrong about shared parenting legislation in The Lawyer.

Of course, the reality is that in most cases, common sense prevails and the parents will try and ensure that the children have a good relationship with them both. It is the right thing and best for the children involved on many fronts. But it is those who are caught in a situation where their ex is being unreasonable on contact issues that the law needs to help. Currently, even if an order is in place granting certain access rights, if the parent with whom the child is resident, most of the time the mother, it is an uphill battle for the absent parent to force them to comply. Enshrining in law that children have the right to a relationship with both parents would surely help this situation.

Andrew Woolley
Family solicitor


Loading comments...

Well said Andrew. It is for the sake of the non-res parents who are on the receiving end of the manipulative, implacably hostile resident parent who make false allegations in their attempts to limit/eradicate them from the child’s life that the law needs to be changed. A level playing field as a starting point would redress this. Equality for all parents has to be brought about….

By Charlie on Sunday May 13, 2012

What do you think?

Have your say



Receive your FREE guide

Your free guide will be available to download immediately and a copy sent by email. Your email address will not be used to send any further correspondence without your permission.